Singapore 
17 November 2010 – We are greatly disappointed and  regret the heavy-handed sentence handed down to Alan Shadrake by the  Singapore Judiciary. This is a major blow to Singapore’s international  credibility as a country that respects the rule of law and has only  served to emphasise the lack of compassion in our Judiciary.
Mr  Shadrake should not have been persecuted for the publication of his  book. His book should have instead been allowed to be publicly discussed  and debated over.
The judgement had failed to consider that the  book dealt with serious topics such as the death penalty as  administrated by the Singapore justice system, no casual reader would or  should read it with an uncritical mind as one would with a book of  fiction.
The persecution of Mr Shadrake, a freelance journalist,  confirms once again that freedom of expression in Singapore remains  repressed. The freedom to express one’s thoughts and criticisms should  be respected and the freedom to gain access to and share alternative  opinions should also be allowed.
The lack of compassion on the  part of the judiciary is especially compelling considering that Alan  Shadrake is a 76 year old person who is sick and weak, with limited  resources. Singapore’s authorities, much as they disagree with the  publication of his book, should take it easy and treat Alan gently. The  sentence passed is cruel and harsh on Mr Shadrake, who is vulnerable in  health. This has put Singapore on the international spotlight once again  for the wrong reason.
Sinapan Samydorai, Think Centre’s Director  of ASEAN Affairs said, “They could have imagined Alan as a 76 year-old  grandfather, vulnerable to poor health, yet stubborn to change while  criticizing Singapore. The best course of action should then have been  to talk to the poor old fellow, give him a hot meal, hold his hand and  walk him home — and the world opinion will have appreciate and thank the  act of kindness. Instead, this uncalled for bullying only earned more  loud cries against unjust and unfair treatment of a 76 year old when  Singapore sends him to 6 weeks in jail and a $20,000 fine as well as an  additional court expense of $55,000. Moreover, he faces additional  charges of criminal contempt of court that justify a 2 years jail term.  Is the lack of compassion on the part of the judiciary a fair reflection  of the policy of the Singapore Parliament?”
The Alan Shadrake case should not have gone to the court, he should have been kindly sent home.
For media enquires, contact Think Centre spokesperson at.
Mr. Sinapan Samydorai
Director of ASEAN Affairs
Think Centre
Ms. Rachel Zeng
Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign       
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
His sentence ought to be doubled and fine tripled.
ReplyDelete